Perryman

David Perryman v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation; Dr. Blaisdell; John Doe Secretary; John Doe Warden; Hodges, Chief Medical Officer

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 5, 20263:25-cv-02072California579 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID PERRYMAN, Case No.: 25cv2072-TWR (BLM)

CDCR #AB-1204,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

Plaintiff, MOTIONS TO CONTINUE vs. SUBMISSION OF APPEAL

(ECF Nos. 11–12)

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS AND

REHABILITATION; DR. BLAISDELL; JOHN DOE Secretary; JOHN DOE 18 Warden; HODGES, Chief Medical Officer; ROBERTS Chief Medical Executive; THE

ENTIRE ADA COMMITTEE,

20 Defendants. 21 22 Presently before the Court are Plaintiff David Perryman’s Motions to Continue Submission of Appeal. (See ECF Nos. 11–12 (“Motions”).) Under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 4(a)(1)(A), “[i]n a civil case, except as provided in Rules 4(a)(1)(B), 4(a)(4), and 4(c), the notice of appeal required by Rule 3 must be filed with the district clerk within 30 days after entry of the judgment or order appealed from.” However, under Rule 4(a)(5)(A), “[t]he district court may extend the time to file a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.