Rivera

Joenathan Rivera v. CortiCare Inc.; and Does 1 to 100, inclusive

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 5, 20263:25-cv-01868California4,315 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOENATHAN RIVERA, Case No.: 3:25-cv-01868-RBM-DEB

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S FIRST

AMENDED COMPLAINT

CORTICARE INC.; and DOES 1 to100,

inclusive, [Doc. 5] Defendants. 16 17 Pending before the Court is Defendant CortiCare, Inc.’s (“Defendant” or the “Company”) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Joenathan Rivera’s (“Plaintiff”) First Amended Complaint (“Motion to Dismiss”). (Doc. 5.) Along with the Motion to Dismiss, Defendant filed the Declaration of Krista Dickerson in support of the Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 5-1 [“Dickerson Decl.”]), Exhibits A–E (Doc. 5-2), and a Request for Judicial Notice (“RJN”) (Doc. 5-3). The Court finds this matter suitable for determination without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons discussed below, the Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 5) is GRANTED. // // …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.