Kenneth Lamont Davis v. Steven Smith, Warden

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 5, 20265:25-cv-01858California416 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No. 5:25-cv-01858-SPG-AGR KENNETH LAMONT DAVIS,

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND

Petitioner,

RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED

v. STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

14 STEVEN SMITH, Warden,

Respondent.

17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, (ECF No. (“Petition”)); the other records on file herein; the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, (ECF No. 4 (“Report”)); and Petitioner Kenneth Lamont Davis’s Objections to the Report, (ECF No. 8 (“Objections”)). Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which objections have been made. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Report. In addition to the Objections, Petitioner has moved for discovery and an evidentiary hearing. See (Objections at 6–8). “A habeas petitioner, unlike the usual civil litigant in federal court, is not entitled to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.