Oswald

Richard Ryan Oswald v. MV Transportation, Inc., et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 5, 20263:25-cv-03053California5,471 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 RICHARD RYAN OSWALD, Case No. 25-cv-03053-AMO

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

v. JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS

MV TRANSPORTATION, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 12 Defendants.

12 Defendants MV Transportation, Inc., and MV Public Transportation, Inc. (together, “MV” or “Defendants”), move for judgment on the pleadings in this Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”) action involving claims of wage and hour violations under state law. The matter is fully briefed and suitable for decision without oral argument. Accordingly, the hearing set for November 6, 2025, was VACATED. See Civil L.R. 7-6, Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 78(b); see also Dkt. No. 25. Having read the papers filed by the parties and carefully considered their arguments therein and those made at the hearing, as well as the relevant legal authority, the Court hereby GRANTS MV’s motion for the following reasons. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Richard Ryan Oswald was employed by MV…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.