Ansari
Proassurance Specialty Insurance Company v. Najeeb K. Ansari
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
PROASSURANCE SPECIALTY Case No. 1:25-cv-01207-SAB
INSURANCE COMPANY,
ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO SHOW Plaintiff, CAUSE IN WRITING WHY MONETARY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT ISSUE FOR v. FAILURE TO FILE JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT
NAJEEB K. ANSARI,
ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL Defendant. SCHEDULING CONFERENCE
DEADLINE: JANUARY 9, 2026
18 A scheduling conference is set for January 6, 2026, in this matter. (ECF No. 5.) The 19 parties were ordered to file a joint scheduling report one full week prior to the scheduling 20 conference. (Id. at 2.) No joint report has been filed in this action. 21 Local Rule 110 provides that “[f]ailure of counsel or of a party to comply with these 22 Rules or with any order of the Court may be grounds for imposition by the Court of any and all 23 sanctions . . . within the inherent power of the Court.” The Court has the inherent power to 24 control its docket…