Yahiya

Forrest Kendrid v. Yahiya, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 5, 20262:23-cv-01145California864 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FORREST KENDRID, No. 2:23-cv-1145 TLN CSK P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS YAHIYA, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a former detainee proceeding without counsel with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 17, 2025, defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 45.) Plaintiff did not file an opposition. On October 8, 2025, this Court granted plaintiff’s first request for extension of time to file his opposition and ordered plaintiff’s opposition due by November 10, 2025. (ECF No. 49.) On November 18, 2025, this Court granted plaintiff’s second request for extension of time to file his opposition and ordered plaintiff’s opposition due within thirty days of the date of the order. (ECF No. 51.) Thirty days passed from November 18, 2025 and plaintiff did not file his opposition. On January 9, 2024, the court advised plaintiff of the requirements for opposing a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.