Prudhel

Jeff Lamonte Sigler v. Josh Prudhel

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 5, 20262:24-cv-01840California718 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JEFF LAMONTE SIGLER, No. 2:24-cv-01840-DC-AC (HC) Petitioner, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

JOSH PRUDHEL, (Doc. No. 15) Respondent. 16 Petitioner Jeff Lamonte Sigler, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On January 15, 2025, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein, which were served on all parties and contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one (21) days. (Doc. No. 15.) On February 4, 2025, Petitioner filed timely objections to the findings and recommendations.1 (Doc. No. 16.) The court reviewed Petitioner’s objections and finds they do not provide a basis upon

1 The Clerk of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.