Nhu Dinh Tran v. City of Elk Grove

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 5, 20262:24-cv-03232California852 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NHU DINH TRAN, Case No. 2:24-cv-03232-DAD-CSK Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING RULE 37 EXPENSES CITY OF ELK GROVE, Defendant. (ECF Nos. 17, 18) 16 On October 3, 2025, the Court granted Defendant City of Elk Grove’s motion to compel Plaintiff Nhu Dinh Tran’s responses to Defendant’s interrogatories, requests for admissions (“RFAs”), and requests for production of documents (“RFPs”) and denied Defendant’s motion for terminating sanctions for failure to respond to Defendant’s interrogatories, RFAs, and RFPs. 10/03/2025 Order (ECF No. 17).1 Because Defendant had not provided the Court with sufficient information to determine the amount of expenses pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(a)(5)(A), the Court ordered Defendant to file and submit its reasonable expenses, including attorney’s fees. 10/03/2025 Order at 8-9. Defendant has now done so. 10/17/2025 Declaration of William J. Bittner (ECF No. 18). Plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.