Tarani-Alike Johnson, et al. v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A., et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 5, 20264:25-cv-10992California2,155 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 TARANI-ALIKE JOHNSON, et al., Case No. 25-cv-10992-HSG

Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER

v. Re: Dkt. No. 3 WELLS FARGO BANK N.A., et al., Defendants.

12 Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ pro se motion for a temporary restraining order (“TRO”). See Dkt. No. 3 (“Mot.”). The Court DENIES the request. I. BACKGROUND On December 26, 2025, Plaintiffs filed a complaint broadly alleging that a 2018 Pennsylvania state court foreclosure verdict against their property is void for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, failure to enter a judgment, and failure to revive a lien that expired in 2023. See Dkt. No. 1 (“Compl.”) ¶¶ 26–29. Plaintiffs also assert several claims against law firms, judges, and individuals involved in the proceedings, including for fraud, conspiracy, RICO violations, and perjury. Id. ¶¶ 15–20. In total, Plaintiffs assert twenty-six different counts against Defendants, ranging from fraud…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.