Maureen Harrington, et al. v. Pinterest, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 5, 20265:20-cv-05290California6,665 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 MAUREEN HARRINGTON, et al., Case No. 5:20-cv-05290-EJD

Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

v.

PINTEREST, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 109 Defendant.

Defendant Pinterest, Inc., (“Pinterest”) moves for summary judgment in this copyright infringement suit brought by Plaintiff Maureen Harrington as a representative of Blaine Harrington III’s estate (collectively, “Harrington”). Def. Pinterest, Inc.’s Notice of Mot. & Mot. for Summ. J. (“Mot.”), ECF No. 109. The motion has been fully briefed. Pl.’s Mem. of P. & A. in Opp’n to Def.’s Mot. for Summ. J. (“Opp’n”), ECF No. 116; Pinterest, Inc.’s Reply in Supp. of Mot. for Summ. J. (“Reply”), ECF No. 120. Upon careful review of the relevant documents, the Court finds this matter suitable for decision without oral argument pursuant to Local Rule 7-1(b). For the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS Pinterest’s motion for summary…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.