Trump

Robert Wooten v. Donald J. Trump

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 5, 20262:25-cv-00873California516 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT WOOTEN, No. 2:25-cv-00873-DC-AC (PS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR RECONSIDERATION

DONALD J. TRUMP, (Doc. No. 24) Defendant.

16 This matter is before the court on Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration of the court’s June 24, 20251 order adopting the assigned magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations and closing this case. (Doc. Nos. 17, 24.) In his pending motion, Plaintiff invokes Rules 59(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which applies after judgment has been entered and provides that “[a] motion to alter or amend a judgment must be filed no later than 28 days after the entry of the judgment.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). “A timely filed motion for reconsideration under a local rule is a motion to alter or amend a judgment under [Rule] 59(e).” Bestran Corp. v. Eagle Comtronics, Inc., 720 F.2d 1019, 1019 (9th Cir. 1983). A motion for reconsideration filed outside that time…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.