(PS)Singh

Raj Singh v. Stephen Lipworth

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 5, 20262:25-cv-01610California1,957 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAJ SINGH, No. 2:25-cv-01610-DJC-SCR Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS STEPHEN LIPWORTH, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this matter, which is referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The Court previously granted Plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis and screened the complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Plaintiff has now filed a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). The Court now recommends the FAC be dismissed without further leave to amend. I. Prior Screening Order In the prior screening order (ECF No. 3), the Court observed that the complaint alleged that the sole defendant, Lipworth, obtained a state court judgment against Plaintiff in 2010. Plaintiff alleged that judgment allowed Lipworth to take his family house, and alleged Lipworth took his properties, destroyed his family, and left him homeless. ECF No. 1 at 4.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.