Jones

Monroe Jones v. Adult Parole Operation, Sacramento California

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 5, 20265:25-cv-04778California1,271 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MONROE JONES, Case No. 25-cv-04778-EKL

Petitioner, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AS

v. MOOT, DISMISSING PETITION

WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR LACK

ADULT PAROLE OPERATION, OF EXHAUSTION

SACRAMENTO CALIFORNIA,

Re: ECF No. 2 11 Respondent.

12 Petitioner Monroe Jones, a California parolee, filed the instant pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, challenging the requirement that he wear an ankle monitor as a condition of his parole. His petition for writ of habeas corpus is now before the Court for review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2243 and Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts. Jones also filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in lieu of prepayment of the filing fee, which the Court DENIES as moot given the Court’s determination that this matter must be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of exhaustion. See ECF No. 2. 21…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.