Griffin

Karen L. Griffin v. Denise Mathre Chiropractic Corporation, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 5, 20262:25-cv-02675California1,945 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KAREN L. GRIFFIN, Case No. 2:25-cv-02675-DC-CSK Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

TO REMAND TO STATE COURT

DENISE MATHRE CHIROPRACTIC CORPORATION, et al., 15 Defendants. (ECF Nos. 1, 2, 4)

17 Defendant Denise P. Mathre is representing herself in this action and seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915.1 (ECF No. 2.) For the reasons that follow, the Court recommends Defendant’s IFP application be denied, this action be remanded back to state court, and Plaintiff Karen L. Griffin’s motion to strike, or in the alternative, motion to remand be denied as moot. I. MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) provides that the court may authorize the commencement, prosecution or defense of any suit without prepayment of fees or security “by a person who submits an affidavit stating the person is “unable to pay such fees or give security 27 This matter proceeds before…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.