Jasmine Sanchez v. Chet Rigney

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 6, 202623-15168California7,138 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 6 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JASMINE PAUL SANCHEZ, No. 23-15168

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:22-cv-00259-MMD-CSD v.

CHET RIGNEY; CURTIS RIGNEY; MEMORANDUM*

WILLIAM REUBART; DAVID

DRUMMOND; TASHEENA COOKE;

JEROME HICKS,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Miranda M. Du, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted October 10, 2025 Las Vegas, Nevada

Before: BENNETT, SANCHEZ, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges. Dissent by Judge BENNETT.

Plaintiff Jasmine Paul Sanchez appeals the district court’s adoption of a

magistrate judge’s report and recommendation that Sanchez’s pro se lawsuit be

dismissed sua sponte, and with prejudice, as a sanction for Sanchez’s

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. nonappearance at his initial case management conference (“CMC”). We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.