Jasmine Sanchez v. Chet Rigney
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 6, 202623-15168California7,138 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 6 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JASMINE PAUL SANCHEZ, No. 23-15168
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:22-cv-00259-MMD-CSD v.
CHET RIGNEY; CURTIS RIGNEY; MEMORANDUM*
WILLIAM REUBART; DAVID
DRUMMOND; TASHEENA COOKE;
JEROME HICKS,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Miranda M. Du, Chief District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted October 10, 2025 Las Vegas, Nevada
Before: BENNETT, SANCHEZ, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges. Dissent by Judge BENNETT.
Plaintiff Jasmine Paul Sanchez appeals the district court’s adoption of a
magistrate judge’s report and recommendation that Sanchez’s pro se lawsuit be
dismissed sua sponte, and with prejudice, as a sanction for Sanchez’s
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. nonappearance at his initial case management conference (“CMC”). We have
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.…