Desiree McGuire v. Roseville Joint Union High School District

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 6, 202623-16169California1,957 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 6 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DESIREE DAWN MCGUIRE; CADENCE No. 23-16169

DEVAULT,

D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellants, 2:22-cv-00125-TLN-JDP

v.

MEMORANDUM*

ROSEVILLE JOINT UNION HIGH

SCHOOL DISTRICT, Nonprofit Public Benefit Corporation; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Troy L. Nunley, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 6, 2026** San Francisco, California

Before: BENNETT, BADE, and SUNG, Circuit Judges.

Pro se Plaintiffs, Desiree McGuire and her daughter, Cadence DeVault, appeal

the dismissal of their legal challenge to the Roseville Joint Union High School

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). District’s (the “District’s”) implementation and enforcement of a face-covering

requirement during the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.