Desiree McGuire v. Roseville Joint Union High School District
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 6, 202623-16169California1,957 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 6 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DESIREE DAWN MCGUIRE; CADENCE No. 23-16169
DEVAULT,
D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellants, 2:22-cv-00125-TLN-JDP
v.
MEMORANDUM*
ROSEVILLE JOINT UNION HIGH
SCHOOL DISTRICT, Nonprofit Public Benefit Corporation; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Troy L. Nunley, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted January 6, 2026** San Francisco, California
Before: BENNETT, BADE, and SUNG, Circuit Judges.
Pro se Plaintiffs, Desiree McGuire and her daughter, Cadence DeVault, appeal
the dismissal of their legal challenge to the Roseville Joint Union High School
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). District’s (the “District’s”) implementation and enforcement of a face-covering
requirement during the…