Laurence J. Graham, et al. v. Dupont de Nemours, Inc., et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 6, 20262:25-cv-06135California4,537 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

JS-6 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LAURENCE J. GRAHAM, et al., Case No. 2:25-cv-06135-FLA (SKx)

Plaintiffs,

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION;

v. DENYING AS MOOT

DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO

DISMISS [DKTS. 15, 19, 23, 24, 26, 28, DUPONT DE NEMOURS, INC., et al., 30, 34, 41, 51, 149, 170, 184], 15 Defendants. PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR EXTENSION [DKT. 49], AND

PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO

REMAND [DKT. 69]; DENYING

PLAINTIFFS’ EX PARTE

APPLICATIONS TO REMAND

[DKTS. 191, 205] AND FOR

SANCTIONS [DKT. 200];

GRANTING DEFENDANTS ILUKA

RESOURCES, INC. AND ILUKA

RESOURCES (TN) LLC’S MOTION

FOR SANCTIONS [DKT. 165]; AND

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

PLAINTIFFS SHOULD NOT BE

DEEMED VEXATIOUS LITIGANTS

26 27 28 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.