Marchak

Richard Janoiko v. Marchak, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 6, 20261:24-cv-00652California835 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICHARD JANOIKO, Case No. 1:24-cv-00652-CDB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL AND

v. REQUEST TO ADD PERSONS AND

ENTITIES TO THIS CLAIM, WITHOUT

MARCHAK, et al., PREJUDICE Defendants. (ECF No. 26) 16 Plaintiff Richard Janoiko (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds against Defendants Marchak, Galarza, and Nikzad (“Defendants”) for deliberate indifference to serious medical needs in violation of the Eighth Amendment. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for appointment of counsel for an ADA inmate and request on how to add persons and entities to this claim, filed December 15, 2025. (ECF No. 26.) Plaintiff states that he is mobility disabled due to his tardive dyskinesia (“TD”) situation which affects his head and hand movement and his entire…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.