Gilligan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ARIEL GILLIGAN, et al., Case No. 25-cv-02873-RFL

Plaintiffs,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

v. STAY AND GRANTING IN PART

AND DENYING IN PART MOTION

EXPERIAN DATA CORPORATION, et TO DISMISS al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 26, 44 Defendants.

Plaintiffs bring this action on behalf of a putative class, alleging that Experian Data Corporation, Experian PLC, Experian Information Solutions, Inc., and Tapad, Inc. (together “Experian”), use Tapad pixels to “track[] in real time and record[] indefinitely the personal information and specific web activity” of Plaintiffs and putative class members. (Dkt. No. 1 (“CAC”) ¶ 1.) They allege that Experian’s conduct constitutes intrusion upon seclusion under California law (Count 1); violates provisions of the California Invasion of Privacy Act (“CIPA”), California Penal Code §§ 631(a) and 638.51(a) (Counts 2–3); constitutes unjust enrichment (Count 4); and violates the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (“ECPA”), 18 U.S.C. § 2511 (Count 5). Experian seeks to stay this action pending resolution of certain arbitration proceedings. (Dkt. No. 44.) …