Arteaga

Jose Arteaga v. M. Palmer, R. Buckel

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 6, 20263:25-cv-03498California877 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 JOSE ARTEAGA, Case No.: 25-cv-03498-AJB-AHG

CDCR #V-29993,

ORDER:

Plaintiff, (1) DENYING MOTION TO vs. PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS 15 (Doc. No. 2) AND

M. PALMER, R. BUCKEL, (2) DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION

17 Defendants. WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PAY FILING FEES REQUIRED BY 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) 19 20 Jose Arteaga (“Plaintiff”), a prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. No. 1.) In lieu of paying the filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a), Plaintiff filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). (Doc. No. 2.) For the reasons discussed below, the Court denies Plaintiff’s IFP motion and dismisses the action without prejudice. I. IFP MOTION All parties instituting any civil action, suit or proceeding in a district court of the United States,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.