(PC)Robles
Joseph Richard Robles v. Warden Martin Gamboa, et al.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSEPH RICHARD ROBLES, No. 1:25-cv-01118-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO
RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE
v. TO THIS ACTION WARDEN MARTIN GAMBOA, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION
RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION
Defendants. FOR FAILURE TO STATE A COGNIZABLE
CLAIM FOR RELIEF
16 (ECF No. 20) 17 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed the instant complaint in this action on November 19, 2024. (ECF No. 1.) On October 3, 2025, the Court screened the Plaintiff’s complaint, found that Plaintiff failed to state a cognizable claim for relief, and granted Plaintiff thirty days to file an amended complaint. (ECF No. 18.) Plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint or otherwise respond to the Court’s screening 27 …