Granson Clark v. Capital One Auto Financing
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 6, 20261:25-cv-01734California2,357 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 GRANSON CLARK, Case No. 1:25-cv-01734-KES-SKO
Plaintiff,
FIRST SCREENING ORDER; ORDER
v. FOR PLAINTIFF TO:
(1) FILE A FIRST AMENDED
COMPLAINT;
CAPITAL ONE AUTO FINANCING, (2) NOTIFY THE COURT THAT HE Defendant. WISHES TO STAND ON HIS
COMPLAINT; OR
15 (3) FILE A NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL (Doc. 1)
FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE
19 On December 4, 2025, Plaintiff Granson Clark (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, filed a complaint against Capital One Auto Financing. (Doc. 1). Plaintiff also filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis, which was granted on January 5, 2026. (Docs. 4 & 5). Plaintiff’s complaint is now before the Court for screening. Upon review, the Court concludes that the complaint fails to state a cognizable claim. Plaintiff has the following…