Granson Clark v. Capital One Auto Financing

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 6, 20261:25-cv-01734California2,357 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 GRANSON CLARK, Case No. 1:25-cv-01734-KES-SKO

Plaintiff,

FIRST SCREENING ORDER; ORDER

v. FOR PLAINTIFF TO:

(1) FILE A FIRST AMENDED

COMPLAINT;

CAPITAL ONE AUTO FINANCING, (2) NOTIFY THE COURT THAT HE Defendant. WISHES TO STAND ON HIS

COMPLAINT; OR

15 (3) FILE A NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL (Doc. 1)

FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE

19 On December 4, 2025, Plaintiff Granson Clark (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, filed a complaint against Capital One Auto Financing. (Doc. 1). Plaintiff also filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis, which was granted on January 5, 2026. (Docs. 4 & 5). Plaintiff’s complaint is now before the Court for screening. Upon review, the Court concludes that the complaint fails to state a cognizable claim. Plaintiff has the following…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.