Clayton Sampson et al. v. United States of America

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 6, 20265:25-cv-03621California118 words

Trial Court Opinion

facts constituting the offense charged.” Fed. R. Crim. P. 3. Not only does the Motion fail to identify an underlying criminal complaint, but the docket also lacks any reference to any criminal complaint. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS the parties show cause as to how the Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this matter. Parties are ORDERED to file a response by January 13, 2026, at 12:00 pm. The Response should identify whether the Court has subject matter jurisdiction over the Motion, whether a civil or criminal complaint has been filed in any other case, and why the Court should not dismiss this action for lack of compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 3.

IT IS SO ORDERED.