Karen Bendana v. County of Orange, et al.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KAREN BENDANA, Case No. 8:25-cv-01310-SSS-AJR
Plaintiff,
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS,
v. CONCLUSIONS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED
COUNTY OF ORANGE, ET AL., STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Defendants.
17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the motions to dismiss, all the 18 records and files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States 19 Magistrate Judge. The Court has considered Plaintiff’s Objections to the Report and 20 Recommendation (the “Objections”), Defendants’ Response to the Objections, and 21 Plaintiff’s Request that the Court Consider Her Objections in Full. The Court has also 22 conducted a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to 23 which Plaintiff objected. 24 The Report and Recommendation (“Report”) recommends that the dismissal of 25 Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint without leave to amend. [Dkt. 38]. Plaintiff’s 26 objections [Dkt. 40] do not merit any change to the Report’s…