Noem
Wanjing Yu v. Kristi Noem, et al.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WANJING YU, No. 1:25-cv-2040 DJC AC Petitioner, v. ORDER KRISTI NOEM, et al., Respondents. 16 Petitioner, proceeding through counsel, has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. This proceeding was referred to the undersigned by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Because petitioner may be entitled to the requested relief if the claimed violation of constitutional rights is proved, respondent will be directed to show cause why the writ should not be granted by filing an answer/return. See 28 U.S.C. § 2243. In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Respondent is directed to file an answer/return within 14 days from the date of this order. If an answer/return is filed, respondent shall include with the answer/return any and all transcripts or other documents relevant to the determination of the issues presented in the application. …