Chestnut

Resul Duzenli v. Christopher Chestnut, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 6, 20261:26-cv-00014California391 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RESUL DUZENLI, No. 1:26-cv-0014 WBS AC Petitioner, v. ORDER CHRISTOPHER CHESTNUT, et al., Respondent. 16 Petitioner, proceeding through counsel, has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. This proceeding was referred to the undersigned by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Because petitioner may be entitled to the requested relief if the claimed violation of constitutional rights is proved, respondent will be directed to show cause why the writ should not be granted by filing an answer/return. See 28 U.S.C. § 2243. In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Respondent is directed to file an answer/return within 14 days from the date of this order. If an answer/return is filed, respondent shall include with the answer/return any and all transcripts or other documents relevant to the determination of the issues presented in the 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.