Howard Herships v. The City of Rancho Cordova, et al.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 HOWARD HERSHIPS, No. 2:25-cv-2953 DC AC (PS) Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 Plaintiff paid the filing fee and is proceeding in this matter pro se; pre-trial proceedings are accordingly referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). Plaintiff sues five defendants, each of whom moves to dismiss. ECF No. 4 (motion by defendant HDL Companies NC), No. 5 (motion by defendant The City of Rancho Cordova), No. 7 (motion by defendant Rancho Cordova Tourist Board Corp. and defendant Rancho Cordova Travel, joined by HDL Companies (ECF No. 29)), No. 10 (motion by defendant Meyers Nave). The motion by defendant Meyers Nave includes an anti-SLAPP motion. ECF No. 10. Plaintiff opposes each motion. ECF No. 26. Two reply briefs were filed. ECF No. 28, 30. Plaintiff filed two motions for a temporary restraining order (ECF Nos. 13 and 23). Because this court…