(PS)Seales-Perkins

Tuesday Seales-Perkins v. Kristen Caprino

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 6, 20262:25-cv-03059California1,296 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TUESDAY SEALES-PERKINS, Case No. 2:25-cv-3059-DC-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS KRISTEN CAPRINO, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff brings this action against attorney Kristen Caprino. Her first amended complaint suffers from the same deficiencies noted in the court’s prior screening order. Accordingly, the court recommends that this action be dismissed for failure to state a claim. Screening and Pleading Requirements A federal court must screen the complaint of any claimant seeking permission to proceed in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). The court must identify any cognizable claims and dismiss any portion of the complaint that is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. Id. A complaint must contain a short and plain statement that plaintiff is entitled to relief,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.