Curtis Daniel Primeaux & Perrielin Sessions v. County of Solano, et al.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CURTIS DANIEL PRIMEAUX & Case No. 2:25-cv-3139-DC-JDP (PS)

PERRIELIN SESSIONS

12 Plaintiffs, ORDER v. 14 COUNTY OF SOLANO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiffs bring this action against numerous defendants—seventeen, as best I can discern—and challenges an adverse child custody decision issued by California state courts. ECF No. 1 at 47. The complaint, as articulated, does not present a cognizable federal claim. I will dismiss the complaint and give plaintiffs an opportunity to remedy the deficiencies identified below. Screening and Pleading Requirements A federal court must screen the complaint of any claimant seeking permission to proceed in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). The court must identify any cognizable claims and dismiss any portion of the complaint that is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. …