Gordon

Mario Alejandro Bula Armenta v. Steve Gordon

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 6, 20262:25-cv-03719California2,094 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARIO ALEJANDRO BULA No. 2:25-cv-03719-DAD-CKD

ARMENTA,

12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION v. FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER 14 STEVE GORDON, (Doc. No. 5) 15 Defendant. 16 17 This matter is before the court on plaintiff’s ex parte motion for a temporary restraining order. (Doc. No. 2.) For the reasons explained below, the court will deny plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order. BACKGROUND On December 29, 2025, plaintiff Mario Alejandro Bula Armenta proceeding pro se initiated this civil rights action against defendant Steve Gordon. (Doc. No. 1.) In his complaint, plaintiff alleges the following. Plaintiff currently possesses a California commercial driver’s license which he uses in connection with his current employment. (Id. at 3.) On November 6, 2025, plaintiff received written notice from the California Department of Motor Vehicles (“DMV”) that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.