Munoz-Perez

United States v. Munoz-Perez

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 7, 202624-556California1,281 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 7 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-556 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 3:21-mj-03297-WVG-GPC-1 v.

FREDDY DANIEL MUNOZ-PEREZ, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Gonzalo P. Curiel, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 4, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: CALLAHAN and KOH, Circuit Judges, and BARKER, District Judge.***

Appellant Freddy Daniel Munoz-Perez appeals his conviction for illegal entry

under 8 U.S.C. § 1325(a)(1). Munoz-Perez argues that § 1325 is unconstitutional

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel previously ordered that the case be submitted on the briefs and record without oral argument. See Dkt. No. 52; Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable J. Campbell Barker, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Texas,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.