Sherman

Melvin Ray Brummett, Jr. v. Stuart Sherman, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 7, 20261:20-cv-00622California708 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MELVIN RAY BRUMMETT, JR., Case No. 1:20-cv-00622-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO

TERMINATE MOTION AND AMEND

v. DOCKET TO REFLECT PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION AS CONSTRUED SURREPLY

STUART SHERMAN, et al., (Doc. No. 92) Defendants. 16 Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. (Doc. No. 79). Plaintiff filed an opposition with a separate statement of undisputed facts. (Doc. Nos. 84, 85). Defendants filed a reply in support of Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, a reply to Plaintiff’s separate statement of undisputed facts, and a reply to Plaintiff’s response to Defendants’ separate statement of undisputed facts. (Doc. Nos. 89-91). On September 25, 2025, Plaintiff filed a pleading titled “Motion to Strike Defendants’ Answers as Undisputed Facts as Contrary to Federal Rules.” (Doc. No. 92). Therein, Plaintiff responds and objects to Defendants’ responses to Plaintiff’s statement of undisputed facts, as…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.