Bryant

Vincent Bryant, et al. v. City of Berkeley, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 7, 20263:21-cv-08169California1,237 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VINCENT BRYANT, et al., Case No. 21-cv-08169-AGT

Plaintiffs,

ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS’ BILL OF

v. COSTS

CITY OF BERKELEY, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 113, 114 Defendants.

The Court granted summary judgment for the defendants City of Berkeley, and Of- ficers Madison Albrandt, Samantha Speelman and Kevin Kleppe (collectively, Defendants) on plaintiff Vincent Bryant’s federal claims and declined jurisdiction over Bryant’s state law claims. Dkt. 111. Judgment for Defendants followed. Dkt. 112. As the prevailing party, De- fendants timely filed a bill of costs, dkt. 113,1 to which Bryant timely objected. Dkt. 114. Having reviewed the parties’ briefing, the Court now exercises its discretion and declines to award costs. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d)(1), “[u]nless a federal statute, these rules, or a court order provides otherwise, costs — other than attorney’s fees — should be allowed to the prevailing party.” Rule 54(d) therefore creates a “presumption for awarding costs to the prevailing party.” Draper v. Rosario, 836 F.3d 1072, 1087 (9th Cir. 2016)

1 Defendants originally…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.