Vacational Bike Rentals LLC v. Kitzuma Corporation et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 6, 20262:24-cv-07105California4,810 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. INTRODUCTION

On August 22, 2024, plaintiff Vacational Bike Rentals LLC (“Plaintiff”) filed this complaint against defendants Kitzuma Corporation dba Kitzuma Cycling Logistics (“Kitzuma”’), GetCarrier, LLC (“GetCarrier”), Speed Express, Inc. (“Speed Express”), Empire National, Inc. (“Empire”), and BikeExchange Limited (“Bikeexchange”’) (collectively, “Defendants”). Dkt. 1 (“Compl.”). On November 5, 2024, the Court granted plaintiff leave to amend to file a first amended complaint. Dkt. 19. On November 15, 2024, plaintiff filed its first amended complaint. Dkt. 21. On July 14, 2025, the Court granted the parties’ stipulation granting plaintiff leave to file its second amended complaint. Dkt. 37. On September 28, 2025, plaintiff filed its operative second amended complaint. Dkt. 43 (“SAC”).! The SAC asserts six claims for relief: (1) breach of contract, against

‘It appears that on September 1, 2025, plaintiff filed a document titled “Second Amended Complaint.” Dkt. 40. However, plaintiff appears to have inadvertently omitted pages 7-8 of this document (dkt. 40) that plaintiff included when it filed docket 43. Thus,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.