Terrill Smith v. United States
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 8 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
TERRILL SMITH, No. 23-15637
Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:21-cv-01928-SPL
v.
MEMORANDUM*
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Steven Paul Logan, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted May 15, 2025 Phoenix, Arizona
Before: RAWLINSON, BUMATAY, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges. Dissent by Judge RAWLINSON.
Terrill Smith (“Smith”) appeals the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion
for alleged ineffective assistance of counsel. We review a district court’s denial of
a § 2255 motion de novo, and the decision whether to hold an evidentiary hearing
on such a motion for an abuse of discretion. United States v. Rodriguez, 49 F.4th
1205, 1211 (9th Cir. 2022). We affirm.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. 1. Smith’s trial counsel did not provide prejudicial ineffective…