Meza
Meza v. Shah CA4/2
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 8, 2026E082921California1,720 words
Opinion
Opinion
Filed 1/8/26 Meza v. Shah CA4/
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
ERIK MEZA,
Plaintiff and Appellant, E082921
v. (Super.Ct.No. CVRI2105350)
PRIYA UDAY SHAH, OPINION
Defendant and Respondent.
APPEAL from the Superior Court of Riverside County. Daniel A. Ottolia, Judge.
Affirmed.
Erik Meza, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant.
Gates, Gonter, Guy, Proudfoot & Muench, LLP, Richard A. Muench and Jasmine
Ng, for Defendant and Respondent.
A jury returned a defense verdict in appellant Erik Meza’s personal injury action—
stemming from a car accident—against defendant and respondent Priya Uday Shah. On
appeal, Meza…