Meza

Meza v. Shah CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 8, 2026E082921California1,720 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 1/8/26 Meza v. Shah CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

ERIK MEZA,

Plaintiff and Appellant, E082921

v. (Super.Ct.No. CVRI2105350)

PRIYA UDAY SHAH, OPINION

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from the Superior Court of Riverside County. Daniel A. Ottolia, Judge.

Affirmed.

Erik Meza, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Gates, Gonter, Guy, Proudfoot & Muench, LLP, Richard A. Muench and Jasmine

Ng, for Defendant and Respondent.

A jury returned a defense verdict in appellant Erik Meza’s personal injury action—

stemming from a car accident—against defendant and respondent Priya Uday Shah. On

appeal, Meza…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.