Young
Young v. Renewal by Andersen, LLC
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
JAN 8 2026
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
BRENDA YOUNG, No. 24-6095 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:24-cv-01759-DJC-CKD v.
MEMORANDUM*
RENEWAL BY ANDERSEN, LLC;
ANDERSEN CORPORATION; RIVER
CITY WINDOW AND DOOR, INC.,
Defendants - Appellants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Daniel J. Calabretta, District Court, Presiding
Submitted December 5, 2025** San Francisco, California
Before: RAWLINSON and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges, and ROSENTHAL, District Judge.***
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Lee H. Rosenthal, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Texas, sitting by designation. Brenda Young filed this class action in California state court asserting
claims under California law for (1) unfair competition, Cal.…