Plaintiffs' Consumer Class v. Hyundai Motor Company
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 8, 202624-7080California654 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 8 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
PLAINTIFFS’ CONSUMER CLASS, No. 24-7080 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 8:22-ml-03052-JVS-KES
DONALD K. BIRNER,
MEMORANDUM*
Objector - Appellant,
v.
HYUNDAI MOTOR COMPANY; KIA
CORPORATION,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California James V. Selna, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted November 19, 2025 Pasadena, California
Before: WARDLAW, BERZON, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.
Objector-appellant Donald Birner appeals from the district court’s order
granting final approval of a class action settlement concerning allegations that
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. certain Hyundai and Kia vehicles were defectively designed and thus vulnerable to
theft. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
A class action settlement must be fair, reasonable, and adequate. Fed. R.