People v. Taylor CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 8, 2026C099805California1,446 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hull, J.

FACTS AND HISTORY OF THE PROCEEDINGS

Early on June 12, 2022, California Highway Patrol officers observed defendant driving a car with its taillights off. Defendant made an unlawful U-turn and nearly hit a car, forcing the car’s driver to swerve onto the sidewalk. The officers stopped defendant who admitted to drinking.

1 A Sacramento police officer assumed the investigation and administered field- sobriety tests. The tests confirmed defendant had been driving under the influence of alcohol. Two preliminary alcohol screening tests recorded defendant’s blood-alcohol level at 0.21 percent and 0.198 percent. Arrested and transported to the county jail, defendant submitted to a blood chemical test. A forensic analysis of the sample revealed that defendant’s blood-alcohol level was 0.218 percent. A county criminalist testified that, based on principles of back extrapolation, defendant’s blood-alcohol concentration may have been as high as 0.26 percent when he made the unlawful U-turn. On the first day of trial, defendant pleaded no contest to driving with a suspended or revoked driver’s license, a misdemeanor (count three), and driving a vehicle not equipped with a functioning…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.