Trump

State of Oregon v. Trump

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 8, 202625-7194California311 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 8 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

STATE OF OREGON; CITY OF Nos. 25-6268, 25-7194 PORTLAND; STATE OF CALIFORNIA, D.C. No. 3:25-cv-01756-IM Plaintiffs - Appellees, District of Oregon, Portland v.

ORDER

DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States; PETER HEGSETH, in his official capacity as Secretary of Defense; UNITED STATES

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE; KRISTI

NOEM, in her official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security; UNITED STATES

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND

SECURITY,

Defendants - Appellants.

MURGUIA, Chief Judge:

On November 19, 2025, this court administratively stayed the district court’s

November 7, 2025, permanent injunction to the extent that it enjoins the

federalization of the Oregon National Guard. Dkt. No. 96. On December 29,

2025, this court issued an order directing the parties “to confer about the

procedural next steps for this appeal” “[i]n light of the United States Supreme

Court’s denial of the federal government’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.