People v. Reynoso CA2/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 8, 2026B342889California471 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 1/8/26 P. v. Reynoso CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

THE PEOPLE, B342889

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. v. 24BFCF00363-01)

JOSE REYNOSO,

Defendant and Appellant.

THE COURT:

Jose Reynoso appeals his conviction of grand theft (Pen. Code, § 487, subd. (a)). His appointed counsel filed a brief

pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende) identifying no issues. Counsel sent a notice to Reynoso’s address of record to inform him of his right to file a supplemental brief, but the mail was returned as undeliverable. Counsel has indicated he lacks Reynoso’s current address, as Reynoso has

1…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.