People v. Gonzales CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 8, 2026F088558California2,824 words

Opinion

Opinion

Snauffer, J.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Defendant Benny Benito Gonzales was charged in an information with assault with a firearm (Pen. Code,1 § 245, subd. (a)(2); count 1), making a criminal threat (§ 422; count 2), possession of a firearm by a felon (§ 29800, subd. (a)(1); count 3), and conspiracy to dissuade a witness (§ 136.1, subd. (c)(2); count 4). He was charged in the same information with a codefendant, Emily Andrade, whose appeal we decided in a separate opinion. (People v. Andrade (July 23, 2025, F087955) [nonpub. opn.].) As to each count, the information alleged that Gonzales committed the offense for the benefit of, at the direction of, or in association with a criminal street gang (§ 186.22, subd. (b)(1)) and that Gonzales personally used a firearm in the commission of counts 1 and 2 (§ 12022.5, subd. (a)). The information further alleged that Gonzales had previously suffered a prior serious felony conviction (§ 667, subd. (a)(1)) as well as a strike conviction under the Three Strikes law (§§ 667, subds. (b)–(i), 1170.12, subds. (a)– (d)). The jury convicted Gonzales on counts 1 through 3 and acquitted him on count 4. The jury also found true that he personally used a firearm in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.