PG&E

Filed 1/8/26 PG&E v. McColm CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Trinity) ----

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, C102038

Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Respondent,

(Super. Ct. No. 10CV065)

v.

PATRICIA A. MCCOLM,

Defendant, Cross-complainant and Appellant.

This appeal arises from a post-judgment order awarding $2,391.09 in costs on appeal to plaintiff Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E). Defendant Patricia A. McColm (McColm), proceeding in propria persona, argues that the trial court committed numerous errors in denying her motion to strike or tax costs. We conclude that McColm’s contentions either are forfeited on appeal or lack merit. Therefore, we affirm.

PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

PG&E filed this action seeking a prescriptive easement…