Joseph Rose v. Slater, Slater & Schulman, et al.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12 JOSEPH ROSE, Case No. 2:25-06112 CV (ADS)

13 Plaintiff, ORDER ACCEPTING UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S v. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

SLATER, SLATER & SCHULMAN, [DOC. # 62]

16 et al., 17 Defendants.

19 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed Plaintiff’s Complaint 20 (Doc. # 1), the First Amended Complaint (Doc. # 17), the Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 34), Plaintiff’s Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss (Doc. ## 43, 47), the Report 23 and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 62, “R&R”), 24 Plaintiff’s Objections to the R&R and other documents Plaintiff has filed regarding the R&R (Doc. ## 66–70,72–76), Defendant’s opposition to Plaintiff’s objections 3 to the R&R (Doc. # 77), and the full record in the case.1 4 The Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the R&R to 5 which objections were made and hereby OVERRULES the objections. The Court 6 notes that Plaintiff’s various challenges to the magistrate judge’s involvement in this…