JS-6

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. 2:25-cv-07334-SVW-JPR Date: January 5, 2026 Title: Phillip Chatman v. T. Mobile USA, et al.

Present: The Honorable STEPHEN V. WILSON, U.S. District Judge

Daniel Tamayo Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder

Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendants: None Present None Present

Proceedings (In Chambers): ORDER DISMISSING CASE FOR FAILURE TO

PAY FILING FEE OR FILE COMPLETE

IN FORMA PAUPERIS REQUEST

All parties instituting a civil action, suit, or proceeding in a district court of the United States must pay a filing fee. 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). An action may proceed despite a party’s failure to pay the filing fee only if the party is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). On November 7, 2025, the Court postponed ruling on Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis (“Request”) because it was incomplete and inconsistent with a Request he filed in another action. Dkts. 2, 9. The Court directed Plaintiff to refile a fully completed Request along with a one-page statement, or pay the filing fee, and it warned that if he did not comply within 30 days the case would be dismissed without prejudice. Dkt. 9. To date, Plaintiff has not responded to the Court’s Order. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED without prejudice, and all other pending matters are TERMINATED. See Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629-31 (1962)

JS-6

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. 2:25-cv-07334-SVW-JPR Date: January 5, 2026 Title: Phillip Chatman v. T. Mobile USA, et al.

(“The authority . . . to dismiss sua sponte for lack of prosecution . . . [is] vested in courts to manage their own affairs so as to achieve the orderly and expeditious disposition of cases.”); Roberts v. Soc. Sec. Dep’t, 2022 WL 4088755, at *2 (S.D. Cal. Sept. 6, 2022) (action may be dismissed without prejudice where plaintiff fails to establish in forma pauperis status and does not pay the required filing fee).

IT IS SO ORDERED.