Newsom
Davin Fenix v. Soto
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVIN FENIX, No. 1:24-cv-00202-JLT-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO COMPEL
v. (ECF No. 45) SOTO,
Defendant.
16 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Defendant’s motion to compel, filed November 26, 2025. I. BACKGROUND This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s failure to protect claim against Defendant Soto. On May 30, 2025, the Court granted summary judgment in favor of Defendants Cassering and Miller for failure to exhaust the administrative remedies. (ECF No. 41.) On June 2, 2025, the Court issued an amended scheduling order, which was later modified at Defendant’s request on October 1, 2025. (ECF Nos. 42, 44.) On November 26, 2025, Defendant filed a motion to compel discovery responses and to 28 modify the…