Falcone
Falcone v. Nestle USA, Inc.
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 9 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MARIE FALCONE, individually and on No. 24-7707 behalf of all others similarly situated, D.C. No. 3:19-cv-00723-L-DEB Plaintiff - Appellee,
v. MEMORANDUM*
NESTLE USA, INC.,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California M. James Lorenz, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted November 19, 2025 Pasadena, California
Before: CLIFTON, BYBEE, and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges. Dissent by Judge CLIFTON.
Appellant Nestlé USA, Inc. (“Nestlé”) challenges the district court’s order
certifying two state-based classes. Appellees allege that Nestlé used deceptive
package labeling, claiming its chocolate products were “sustainably” or
“responsibly” sourced, implying that they were produced free of child labor and
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. deforestation. Namely, Appellees assert…