Arriola

Arriola v. Ramirez CA2/7

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 9, 2026B333438California3,150 words

Opinion

Opinion

Stone, J.

Filed 1/9/26 Arriola v. Ramirez CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SEVEN

ANDREW MARTIN ARRIOLA, B333438

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 23STRO00568) v.

RENE RAMIREZ,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEALS from a judgment and orders of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Dean H. Hansell, Judge. Appeals dismissed in part and affirmed in part. Ropers Majeski and Edward A. Hoffman for Plaintiff and Appellant. No appearance for Defendant and Respondent. __________________________ Rene Ramirez appeals from a one-year civil harassment restraining order protecting Andrew Martin Arriola and awarding him attorney fees. Ramirez also appeals the trial court’s denials of his motions for new trial and judgment…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.