Lopez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHRISTOPHER HARRIS, Case No. 1:24-cv-01295-JLT-EPG (PC)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

v. FOR APPOINTMENT OF PRO BONO

COUNSEL AND GRANTING PLAINTIFF

LOPEZ, et al., AN EXTENSION TO RESPOND TO THE

COURT’S FINDINGS AND

Defendants. RECOMMENDATIONS

(ECF No. 15).

16 Plaintiff Christopher Harris is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil 17 rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 18 On August 1, 2025, the Court screened Plaintiff’s first amended complaint and 19 concluded that Plaintiff failed to state any cognizable claims. (ECF No. 13). After Plaintiff 20 failed to respond to the screening order, the Court issued findings and recommendations on 21 December 9, 2025, recommending that Plaintiff’s case be dismissed, with prejudice, for failure 22 to state a claim, failure to prosecute, and failure to comply with a court order. (ECF No. 14). 23 Now before the Court is Plaintiff’s…