Hutchinson
Cessaly D. Hutchinson v. Gale Pines Nicholson, et al.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CESSALY D. HUTCHINSON, Case No.: 25-cv-3371-RSH-JLB
Plaintiff,
ORDER (1) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
v. MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA
PAUPERIS, AND (2) DISMISSING
GALE PINES NICHOLSON, et al.,
COMPLAINT
Defendants. [ECF No. 5]
17 On December 1, 2025, plaintiff Cessaly D. Hutchinson, proceeding pro se, filed this lawsuit along with a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). ECF Nos. 1 (“Compl.”); 2. Plaintiff sues three individuals: Gale Pines Nicholson, Phyllis Pines Garnett, and Timothy Nicholson. On December 3, 2025, the Court issued an order (1) denying Plaintiff’s IFP motion as incomplete, and (2) dismissing the Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) for failure to state a claim. ECF No. 3. The Court granted Plaintiff leave to either pay the filing fee or file a new IFP motion, and to file an amended complaint. Id. at 5. On December 10, 2025, Plaintiff filed her Amended…